Request analysis →
FR EN
Algorithmic analysis of EEAT signals
№69 Ym Core
Core · E-E-A-T pillar

YMYL: what Google expects on sensitive topics

📖 14 min min read · Cross-cutting concept · requirement multiplier

Why this signal matters for Google

YMYL stands for Your Money or Your Life. It is not a signal you switch on: it is a requirement multiplier. On these topics, Google raises the bar on every other signal in the table at once. The definition comes from section 2.3 of the Quality Rater Guidelines, the public manual Google's evaluators follow: YMYL covers topics whose content "could significantly impact the health, financial stability, or safety of people, or the welfare or well-being of society".

To judge the risk, Google looks at three circles: the person reading the page, the people affected by what that person does next, and society as a whole. A page can be YMYL for two reasons. Either the topic is harmful in itself, like self-harm or criminal acts. Or a mistake would cause real damage if factual accuracy is not there: heart attack symptoms, how to invest, who can vote.

A point most sites miss: YMYL is a sliding scale, not a yes/no label. The manual asks raters to sort pages three ways: clear YMYL, may be YMYL, not YMYL. One example per level: tsunami evacuation routes are clearly YMYL; tomorrow's weather probably is not; music award winners are not at all. Most sites cannot even list their YMYL pages, and that is exactly where a compliance audit starts.

Section 3.4.1 draws a line that changes everything for creators: on a YMYL topic, lived experience can be enough when the page tells a personal story, like living with cancer. But as soon as the page gives advice, like how to treat cancer, formal expertise is required: a degree or a qualification someone can check. Mixing up the two, telling versus advising, is the costliest mistake on the web.

The NeuroEEAT scoring grid (0-10)

This scale rates the YMYL compliance of your sensitive pages. On a clearly YMYL topic, any score under 7/10 exposes the page to a Low or Lowest rating.

ScoreDescriptionConcrete indicators
0-2YMYL topic treated carelesslyNo author, no sources, nobody identifiable behind the site, and content copied from elsewhere on a health, money or legal topic.
3-4Minimal awarenessAn author is named, but nothing proves their competence. Few sources, no revision date.
5-6Basics in placeIdentified author, some reliable sources, a site owner you can find, dated content.
7-8Solid complianceQualified author (degree or relevant experience per 3.4.1), sources aligned with what the field's experts agree on, visible contact and customer service.
9-10YMYL referenceEvery page is reviewed by a certified expert you can identify, the editorial policy is published, revisions are dated, sources are cited, and it is clear who answers for what, end to end.

How to audit it on your site

A YMYL audit starts with one question: which of your pages could cause real harm? Proceed in 5 steps.

  1. 01

    Map your topics on the spectrum

    Classify each page: clear YMYL, may be YMYL, or not YMYL, using the 4 official categories (Health/Safety, Financial Security, Government/Civics & Society, Other). Only the first two classes require reinforced treatment.

  2. 02

    Check the content type: lived or advice?

    For each YMYL page, ask: does this page tell a personal story, or does it give advice? A lived story can be signed by a patient. Treatment advice requires a qualification someone can check (section 3.4.1).

  3. 03

    Check against expert consensus

    Section 3.2 requires facts to be accurate and to match what the field's experts agree on. Verify every claim on your YMYL pages against the reference sources: a contradiction without justification can earn Lowest, the manual's worst rating.

  4. 04

    Audit the accountability chain

    Section 2.5.3: who is responsible for the site, how do you reach them, is there customer service? On a sales page or a YMYL page, an anonymous owner is enough to sink the rating.

  5. 05

    Prioritize by risk × traffic

    Cross each page's YMYL level with its visits. A clearly YMYL page with lots of traffic and a low score on this scale: that is the one you fix first.

How to activate or improve it

Three compliance levels, from the vital minimum to sector reference.

Beginner

Visible accountability

  • Identify your clear YMYL pages
  • Show a named responsible party on each
  • Date the content and its last revision
  • Add visible contact and customer service
  • Remove claims that have no source
Intermediate

Demonstrated qualification

  • Attach every piece of advice to a qualified author
  • Clearly separate lived stories from expert advice
  • Tie every fact to a reference source in the field
  • Publish an editorial policy
  • Declare the author and reviewer in the code (author + reviewedBy in Schema.org)
Pro

Field reference

  • Have every YMYL page reviewed by a certified expert people can identify
  • Publish your verification process
  • Watch what the field's experts are saying, and fix your pages when it moves
  • Measure YMYL compliance in the quarterly audit
  • Train writers on the 4 official categories

5 common mistakes to avoid

❌ Believing the "5 YMYL sectors" (health, finance, legal, real estate, news) repeated by SEO blogs
✅ Using the 4 official categories from section 2.3: Health/Safety, Financial Security, Government/Civics & Society, Other
❌ Treating YMYL as a yes/no label: "my site isn't a health site, I'm not concerned"
✅ Thinking page by page: a lifestyle blog publishing "how to invest" has a clear YMYL page
❌ Requiring a degree for everything, or the opposite: medical advice signed by a web writer
✅ Applying rule 3.4.1: personal story = experience is enough; advice = formal expertise required
❌ Sales or donation page with no identifiable owner or customer service
✅ Named responsible party, full contact details, visible support channel (section 2.5.3)
❌ Contradicting the experts to stand out ("what doctors won't tell you")
✅ Aligning with what experts agree on, and backing any different position with first-hand sources

Sector specifics

Health

YMYL Health or Safety

Symptoms, treatments, nutrition, physical or online safety: the most watched category. Advice requires a medical qualification someone can check; a patient's story goes through lived experience.

Finance & real estate

YMYL Financial Security

Investing, mortgages, taxes, insurance, major purchases: anything that could stop someone from paying their bills. Transparent prices and an identifiable owner required.

Legal

Straddling two categories

Legal information touches both Government/Civics & Society (rights, procedures) and Financial Security (divorce, estate, litigation). The most demanding niche, and the least well served.

E-commerce

Transactional = YMYL

Any page that takes a payment or collects personal data touches financial security. Visible customer service and a clear return policy: non-negotiable.

Signals to activate in parallel

YMYL is never worked alone: it raises the bar on these signals in particular.

FAQ

Is my site YMYL?

The question applies page by page, not site by site. Classify each page on the sliding scale (clear / may be / not YMYL) using the 4 categories from section 2.3. A recipe site is not YMYL, but its "diabetic diet" page clearly is.

Can you rank on YMYL without being a doctor or lawyer?

Yes, in two cases provided by section 3.4.1: telling an authentic personal story (a patient's journey, buying your first home), or having your advice reviewed by a qualified expert people can identify (reviewedBy).

Is YMYL a penalty?

No. It is a requirement level: Google's evaluators apply their strictest standards to these pages. Handled well, a YMYL topic is also where serious competition is thinnest.

Does Google say 4 or 5 categories?

Four, word for word, in the September 11, 2025 version: YMYL Health or Safety, YMYL Financial Security, YMYL Government/Civics & Society, and YMYL Other. The "5 sectors" list comes from SEO blogs, not from the official manual.

What score should YMYL pages target on the table's signals?

NeuroEEAT applies a reinforced requirement: aim for at least 7/10 on signals marked "Reinforced YMYL requirement" (factual accuracy, legal notice, contact, reviews, sources, customer service), versus 5/10 on standard topics.

Anonymized case study

Illustrative scenario · for illustration only, validate with your own data

Before compliance work

Clear YMYL pages identified0 of 40
Qualified author on advice pagesNone
Visible owner and supportNo
Facts sourced to consensusRarely

After 90 days

Clear YMYL pages identified12 of 40
Qualified author on advice pages12/12 with reviewedBy
Visible owner and supportOn every page
Facts sourced to consensusSystematic

Illustrative scenario of the compliance process, not a real client case. Gains depend on sector, competition and site history.